Turn the Other Nuke

Turn the Other Nuke

October 7, 2022 by Gregg DeMey

In the ongoing war instigated by Russia against Ukraine, there have been a surprising number of Ukrainian military victories of late. As Russian military might and morale diminish, Vladamir Putin has taken a series of increasingly desperate actions:

  • He has threatened the use of “tactical” nuclear weapons. According to Reuters, “Tactical nuclear weapons are essentially nuclear weapons used on the battlefield for a ‘tactical’ purpose and which are much less powerful than the big bombs that would be needed to destroy large cities… Such weapons can be dropped from planes, fired on missiles from the ground, ships or submarines, or detonated by ground forces."

  • After sham referendums, Putin annexed four Ukrainian oblasts (states) and declared them to be part of the Russian Republic.* The four annexed regions make up about 15% of Ukraine's territory, and none were fully under Russian control at the time. The annexation is the largest in Europe since World War II.

  • While the newly annexed oblasts are still being fought over, and while the border between Russia and Ukraine is moving daily, Russia has threatened nuclear retaliation for any military incursion that violates the Russian border.

All of the above have raised the global stakes of the conflict in Ukraine to a tenuous new level – strangely, there has been relatively little media attention to this smoldering situation. I confess that as a product of the Cold War era of the 1970s, nuclear threats strike a deep chord with me. What would happen if Russia resorted to the use of a nuclear weapon, even of the small, “tactical” variety?

Retired General and former CIA chief David Petraeus said that if Moscow used nuclear weapons, then the United States and its NATO allies would destroy Russian troops and equipment in Ukraine - and sink its entire Black Sea fleet. How would Russia respond to such a massive attack from the Western allies?

How I wish, hope, and pray that the moral standards of Jesus could apply to geopolitics. We, humans, have a long track record of playing the game of power but rarely turn the other cheek. I’ve concluded that followers of Jesus measure right and wrong differently than the powerful people and governments of this world. It’s as if Christians measure in meters and liters while the political class measures in ounces and stones.

Though stronger than the sturdiest president or prince, Jesus demonstrated the might of his mercy through the surprise of self-sacrifice. His humility on the cross exposed the worst of our self-serving human religious and political power grabs, all while forgiving us, the perpetrators, who “know not what they were doing.”

When it comes to making decisions about right and wrong – in the use of power, words, money, even sexuality – I’m sticking with Jesus even when it seems to all the world that we’re measuring with the wrong yardstick.

- Pastor Gregg

PreviousInvisible Things
Next The Confessional Church